Question

Evaluate a specific listening situation using the​ Sapir-Whorf and Bernstein hypothesis. What was the​context? What was the​ speaker's main​ goal? Was the speaker​ credible?

Answer 1

Below is an absolutely accurate answer.

The speaker main goal and context was-

The Sapir-Whorf principle, which expresses that an individual's nearby language impacts how that individual believes, is difficult to illustrate or to discredit.

The maximum grounded symptoms that the powerless version of the theory is right comprise the accompanying:

* In dialects with syntactic sex, people associate manly traits with manly things and lady characteristics with ladylike things.

* In English, we supply man or woman focused bearings: turn left here, turn in that spot. In Dyribal, a local language from Australia, you provide compass-based headings: turn east here, flip south there. As a symptom, when long gone up in opposition to with lodgings that are indistinguishable apart from being switched, an English-speaker is sure to think they resemble the other the same, and a Dyribal speaker is certain to see the distinction.

* Benjamin Whorf himself refered to the Hopi language, which does not have the thoughts of past, present, and future.

-Yes, speaker was credible.

The shortcomings in the hypothesis, specially the solid form of the hypothesis, had been referenced by means of George Steiner in his book, After Babel. In my own words:

The competition is on a completely primary level roundabout: we contend that mental contrasts offer ascent to phonetic contrasts, and we make use of semantic contrasts to contend intellectual contrasts.

On the off chance that dialects spoke to totally excellent global perspectives, at that point interpretation from Navajo into Spanish, Malagasy into Arabic, and Dyribal into English should be unthinkable. It need to be unimaginable for people to get bilingual, for the same explanation.

Thanks

Hope you will appreciate