What is the right to privacy and what is the constitutional basis for it? Discuss at least three Supreme Court cases that involve the right to privacy issue.
answer-
The right to privacy refers to the concept that one's personal information is protected from public scrutiny. U.S. Justice Louis Brandeis called it "the right to be left alone." While not explicitly stated in the U.S. Constitution, some amendments provide some protections.
The right to privacy most often is protected by statutory law. For example, the Health Information Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) protects a person's health information, and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) enforces the right to privacy in various privacy policies and privacy statements.
The right to privacy often must be balanced against the state's compelling interests, including the promotion of public safety and improving the quality of life. Seat-belt laws and motorcycle helmet requirements are examples of such laws. And while many Americans are quite aware that the government collects personal information, most say that government surveillance is acceptable.
Constitutional rights
The right to privacy often means the right to personal autonomy, or the right to choose whether or not to engage in certain acts or have certain experiences. Several amendments to the U.S. Constitution have been used in varying degrees of success in determining a right to personal autonomy:
Skinner v. Oklahoma (1942)
An Oklahoma law providing for the sterilization of people found to be "habitual criminals" is struck down, based on the idea that all people have a fundamental right to make their choices about marriage and procreation, despite the fact that no such right is explicitly written in the Constitution.
Tileston v. Ullman (1943) & Poe v. Ullman (1961)
The Court refuses to hear a case on Connecticut laws prohibiting the sale of contraceptives because no one can demonstrate they have been harmed. Harlan's dissent, however, explains why the case should be reviewed and why fundamental privacy interests are at stake.
Griswold v. Connecticut (1965)
Connecticut's laws against distribution of contraceptives and contraceptive information to married couples are struck down, with the Court relying on earlier precedent involving the rights of people to make decisions about their families and procreation as a legitimate sphere of privacy which the government does not have limitless authority over.
What is the right to privacy and what is the constitutional basis for it? Discuss at least three Supreme Court cases tha...
What is the right to privacy and what is the constitutional basis for it? Discuss at least three Supreme Court cases that involve the right to privacy issue. (US Supreme Court) Response length requirement: 350 words or more
Question 1: Discuss the 14th Amendment and the right to privacy. Include the relevant portion of the 14hAmendment. Also discuss the relevant Supreme Court cases. Question 2 Discuss the right of self-defense of person and property. Question 3: Discuss the differences and similarities between civil and criminal law. Question 4:Disuss capital punishment including its common law and constitutional history. Question 5. Discuss the 14th Amendment and the Bill of Rights. Include the relevant portion of the Amendment. Include John Marshall's...
The Supreme Court in In re Quinlan discussed Karen’s right to privacy at length. What documents and precedent did the Court look to in order to establish Karen’s legal right to privacy? How did the Court evaluate the interests of the state in light of Karen’s right to privacy? Because Karen could not assert her rights, how did the Court ultimately reason that these rights should be asserted?
Analyze the benefits and consequences of affirmative action. What are the goals of affirmative action? In what areas of public policy have affirmative action policies been most commonly used? Describe at least two prominent Supreme Court decisions associated with affirmative action. Response length requirement: 350 words or more
Refer to the LawNow article, "The Rule of Law: Two Notable Supreme Court Decisions to Celebrate" written by Rob Normey. According to the article, which of the following statements is FALSE? Select one: a. The concept of the rule of law and the need to strictly comply with it is often presented with a flourish in legal and political debates. b. The article celebrated the Mackeigan v. Hickman (1989) and R. v Westendorp cases c. One essential aspect of the...
Business Law questions: 1. For many years, the Supreme Court believed that “commercial speech” was entitled to less protection than other forms of speech. One defining element of commercial speech is that its dominant theme is to propose a commercial transaction. This kind of speech is protected by the First Amendment, but the government is permitted to regulate it more closely than other forms of speech. However, the government must make reasonable distinctions, must narrowly tailor the rules restricting commercial...
a] Read the New York Times article, “In Narrow Decision, Supreme Court Sides With Baker Who Turned Away Couple” . Briefly summarize the case. b] Use as many specific concepts and contents from this course to develop your argument either in favor or against that Supreme Court ruling. c] Can you identify any direct and/or indirect violence associated with this conflict? Article: WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Monday ruled in favor of a Colorado baker who had refused to...
Help Define what at least three reasons why there are not human races but also discuss does the term still persists. Please write a 500 word type it not on a paper and use your own words. Thanks in advance ,
Question 1 [The Constitution] is made for people of fundamentally differing views, and the accident of our finding certain opinions natural and familiar or novel and even shocking ought not to conclude our judgment upon the question whether statutes embodying them conflict with the Constitution of the United States. This quote from the 1905 dissent to the Lochner v. New York decision tells us that Question 1 options: a) the Constitution contains nothing shocking. b) the divisions among people will...