Question

How does Marxism explain the international phenomenon? Please give exmaples

Answer 1

Marxist ideas are all related by the common goal of contributing to what they consider as the greater good of mankind and its environment. In other words, Marxists should remain aware and mindful of the fundamental and most common aspects of society and its environment. This also suggests that if the industrial revolution (and capitalism in general) smells like burning coal, overcrowded warehouses, and fumes of gasoline, the smells of the next revolution should be less lethal, less polluting, and more earth-protective. To understand Marxism, we need to understand the fundamental elements of Marx's innovations in terms of the origins and functioning of capitalism. A Marxist would point out that IR is not only about the foreign policy of states or the behavior of politicians, but more about survival (or more broadly, life), reproduction, technology, and labor. If this is correct, then the separation between political and economic, or public and private, is problematic because these categories hide how the social relations and structures of the global economy, such as multinational corporations or international financial institutions, determine how states and foreign policies are determined. In other words, Marxism basically asks what' international' is in IR.

Whether it's anarchy for the English school of realists or global society, Marxists argue that such ideas are counterproductive because they make us believe in the world's delusions and myths. For example, the theory of anarchy generates the mirage that states are autonomous entities that can be predicted for rational behaviour. However, this ignores the endurance of regional inequalities and the structural and historical connections between states, violence, and the global political economy's key actors.

In short, interdependence characterizes Marxism. The Marxist term for this is dialectics, which underpins the relationship between all the previous concepts discussed in this chapter. Both definitions represent social relationships for Marxism, but categories take on their own existence and often cover those social relationships. Overcomplicating or abussing this definition is simple. However, it is a crucial starting point for understanding the world as a whole, not just its individual parts, as' dialectics is a way of thinking that focuses on the full range of changes and interactions that are taking place in the world