How do Bandura’s and Rotter’s views on cognitive factors differ from Skinner’s views?
Cognitive theory which was social, given by Bandura, is a lesser acute kind of behaviorism as compared to Skinner’s, and it follows the spirit of times and the influence of revived interest of psychology in factors of cognition.
Bandura’s point of view continued to be behaviorist. His work interest was to inspect the behavior of subjects which were humans in communication. He did not make use of introspection, and he focused the significance of reinforcements and rewards in getting and adjusting behavior.
Rotter was the first one to make use of “theory of learning which was social”. He established a kind of behaviorism which was cognitive, which included reference to innate experiences which were subjective.
Rotter censured Skinner for analyzing separate subjects in desolation, contending that one learns behavior mainly by experiences which are social. Lab work by Rotter was intense and controlled well, mundane of movements of behaviorism. He worked on only humans in social communication.
Rotter focused on processes which were cognitive to a larger extent as compared to Bandura. Rotter considered that one perceives oneself as conscious individuals adept of clouting the experiences affecting one’s life.
One’s behavior is regulated by stimulus which was external and from the reinforcement provided, however, the comparable influence of these factors is arbitrated by one’s process which is cognitive.