Describe Skinner’s views on theorizing, the mechanistic spirit, intervening variables, and the use of statistics.
In many aspects, position of skinner presented a regeneration of behaviorism of Watson. Skinner proposed an experimental system with no framework which was theoretical for conducting research, whereas, Hull focused on the significance of theory.
Skinner never solved a problem by forming a hypothesis. He never derived theorems and acknowledged them for an empirical check. He did not have any presumed behavioral model, certainly not a mentalistic or physiological one, and also not a one with concepts.
He found it very tough to absorb somebody’s thinking as his own in psychology. He never had read anybody’s or any kind of psychology. Behaviorism by Skinner was devoted by studying reactions.
He was bothered about demonstrating instead of explaining behaviorism. His work dealt with behavior which was observable and he trusted that task of inquiry which is scientific is to develop relationships of function between conditions of stimulus controlled by experimenter and the eventual responses of the organism.
Skinner did not bother about inspecting about what could be taking place within the organism. His work did not include ideas about entities which were internal, whether variables of intervention, processes of physiology or drives.
Therefore, behaviorism of Skinner which was completely descriptive was known as organism which was empty approach. Human beings are operated and controlled by drives from the environment, world which is external and nit by the drives inside the organism.