Question

Public health class question, ASAP please and need to be detail

Thank you so much!!!

1. Compare and Contrast the biological framework and the socio-ecological framework for public health. Select a single disease/risk factor that would best be approached from and biological framework, and another that would best be approached from a socio-ecological framework. Justify your answer.

2.Select one disease and a single risk factor. Describe one current way in which public health is addressing that risk factor. explain the theoretical framework that is used to justify th public health intervention and using Frieden's intervention pyramid, explain if it is a good use of our public health resources and capital.   Justify your answer.

3. In the context of the Affordable Care Act and other Entitlement Insurance programs such as Medicaid and SCHIP please define and equal and equitable support of access to care, how they differ and state whether you advocate for equal or equitable access to care. Justify your answer. .

Answer 1

1. Compare and Contrast the biological framework and the socio-ecological framework for public health. Select a single disease/risk factor that would best be approached from and biological framework, and another that would best be approached from a socio-ecological framework.

The ecological framework is based on evidence that no single factor can explain why some people or groups are at higher risk of interpersonal violence, while others are more protected from it. This system sees relational viciousness as the result of connection among numerous elements at four levels—the individual, the relationship, the network, and the societal.

1. At the individual level, individual history and organic elements impact how people carry on and improve their probability of turning into an injured individual or a culprit of viciousness. Among these elements are being a casualty of tyke abuse, mental or identity issue, liquor as well as substance misuse and a background marked by carrying on forcefully or having encountered misuse.
2. Individual connections, for example, family, companions, suggest accomplices and associates may impact the dangers of turning into an unfortunate casualty or culprit of brutality. For instance, having brutal companions may impact whether a youngster participates in or turns into a casualty of savagery.
3. Community contexts in which social relationships occur, such as schools, neighbourhoods and workplaces, also influence violence. Risk factors here may include the level of unemployment, population density, mobility and the existence of a local drug or gun trade.

The natural system treats the association between elements at the distinctive levels with equivalent significance to the impact of elements inside a solitary level. For instance, longitudinal investigations recommend that entanglements related with pregnancy and conveyance, maybe in light of the fact that they prompt neurological harm and mental or identity issue, appear to anticipate viciousness in youth and youthful adulthood fundamentally when they happen in blend with different issues inside the family, for example, poor child rearing practices. The environmental structure clarifies the outcome—brutality further down the road—as the connection of an individual hazard factor, the results of entanglements amid birth, and a relationship chance factor, the experience of poor child rearing. This system is additionally valuable to distinguish and bunch mediation techniques dependent on the environmental level in which they act. For instance, home appearance intercessions act in the relationship level to fortify the bond among parent and kid by supporting positive child rearing practices.

The ecological framework: examples of risk factors at each level