Question

In what ways do systematic reviews provide better evidence on which to base intervention decisions than personal experience? Why should qualitative data from community members be considered in the mix of evidence when planning a community-based intervention?

Answer 1

Systematic review	Personal Experience
e.g Randomized Control Trial or RCT Supposedly the best	In Community e.g a case- control study
number of studies are many many more with Controls	number of studies Less

Not Biased	Biased
This study draws numerical inference from many similar study design	Not many similar study design present
A panel of experts leads the researcher in many places and then review which work has got enough quality to include in review	Not such

Result 1. A drug trial include the drug for treatment	Can Never be a new drug included in treatment
2. Health policy can be set up	No policy can be set up from this inadequate study

community-based intervention is needed to improve the quality of lives of community e,g illness, psychiatric problems, schooling, vaccinations that means to improve the quality of lives of neighborhood,schools,churches,work sites etc.A different socio-cultural background needs different approach So to alleviate their illness or increase their well being a public health approach including the community members should be included.