Question

Provide a brief overview of how Canada provides healthcare to its citizens. Include what type of system it has (such as single payer, national health insurance, etc.). Discuss how Canada's system pays for its health care and how it is funded (for example, through taxes). Include how much citizens have to pay for their healthcare. Describe one positive feature of Canada's healthcare system. Describe one challenge of the Canada's health care system. Discuss one lesson that the United States could learn from the Canada's health care system.

Answer 1

Canada's publicly funded health care system is dynamic--reforms have been made over the past four decades and will continue in response to changes within medicine and throughout society. The basics, however, remain the same--universal coverage for medically necessary health care services provided on the basis of need, rather than the ability to pay.

When all is said in done, Canada's Constitution sets out the forces of the administrative and the commonplace and regional governments. Under the Constitution Act, 1867, the territories were in charge of setting up, keeping up and overseeing clinics, havens, foundations and beneficent organizations, and the national government was given ward over marine doctor's facilities and isolate. The central government was additionally offered forces to assess and acquire, and to spend such cash as long as this did not encroach on common forces. The government bureau of Agriculture secured bureaucratic wellbeing duties from 1867 until 1919, when the division of Health was made. Throughout the years the obligations of the two dimensions of government have changed.

Prior to World War II, medicinal services in Canada was, generally, secretly conveyed and subsidized. In 1947, the legislature of Saskatchewan presented an area wide, all inclusive healing center consideration plan. By 1950, both British Columbia and Alberta had comparative designs. The national government passed the Hospital Insurance and Diagnostic Services Act in 1957, which offered to repay, or cost share, one-portion of common and regional expenses for indicated healing center and demonstrative administrations. This Act accommodated openly controlled all inclusive inclusion for a particular arrangement of administrations under uniform terms and conditions. After four years, every one of the areas and domains had consented to give openly subsidized inpatient doctor's facility and analytic administrations.

Saskatchewan introduced a universal, provincial medical insurance plan to provide doctors' services to all its residents in 1962. The federal government passed the Medical Care Act in 1966, which offered to reimburse, or cost share, one-half of provincial and territorial costs for medical services provided by a doctor outside hospitals. Within six years, all the provinces and territories had universal physician services insurance plans.

From 1957 to 1977, the federal government's financial contribution in support of health care was determined as a percentage (one-half) of provincial and territorial expenditure on insured hospital and physician services. In 1977, under the Federal-Provincial Fiscal Arrangements and Established Programs Financing Act, cost sharing was replaced with a block fund, in this case, a combination of cash payments and tax points.  

For some commentators of U.S. social insurance, the Canadian arrangement of general medicinal services has for quite some time been seen as an option, unrivaled model for the U.S. to pursue. Canada's single-payer framework is generally openly supported, while the U.S. has a multi-payer, vigorously private framework. While disappointment with the U.S. social insurance framework is across the board among Americans, Canada's human services framework appreciates elevated amounts of fulfillment among its own populace. Much of the appeal of the Canadian system comes from the fact that it seems to do more for less. Canada provides universal access to health care for its citizens, while nearly one in five non-elderly Americans is uninsured. In Canada, coverage is not tied to your job or dependent on your income; rich and poor are in the same system, and enjoy equal access.

However a year ago, Canada spent far less of its GDP on human services than did the U.S. — 10.4% contrasted and 17.8% in the U.S. — which was the most astounding level of any country on the planet, as per the World Health Organization. For all that, Canada scored superior to the U.S. on two usually refered to wellbeing result measures — newborn child mortality and future.