What does Foot mean when she claims that the word good means the same thing when applied to features of humans as when applied to features of plants? Do you think she is right?
Philippa Foot has for decades been oxford’s best-known and most original ethicists. Her groundbreaking papers won her worldwide recognition. When we say something is good, say one’s ears or eyes are good, we mean they are as they should be, as human ears ought to be, that they fulfil the function that ears are needed for in human life. Which of course is different from the particular function that, say, the ears of a gull serve, because gulls have to be able to recognise the sound of their chick among thousands of others on a cliffface from some way out to sea, and our ears don’t have to be quite as good as that. Similarly, we don’t have to see well in the dark. There’s nothing wrong with our eyes because we can’t see in the dark. But owls’ eyes are defective if they can’t see in the dark. So there’s this notion of a defect which is species-relevant. Things aren’t just good or bad, they’re good in a certain individual, in relation to the manner of life of his or hers or its species. That’s the basic idea. And morall defects are just one more example of this kind of defect.
So let’s take plants. A plant needs strong roots, and in the same sort of way human beings need courage. When one is talking about what a human being should do, one says things like, “look, he should be able to face up to danger in certain circumstances, for his own sake and for the sake of others.” But this is like saying, “an owl should be able to see in the dark, should be able to fly” or “a gull should be able to recognize the sound of its chick among all the cacophony of the cliff.” And if you think of it in this way then you’re not going to think that there’s a gap between facts and evaluation – between description of facts, such as ‘owls hunt by night’, that’s a description of fact, and another description, such as ‘that owl’s got weak eyesight; it’s doesn’t seem to be able to manage in the dark’. These are the central notions. And that’s why I thought we should start moral philosophy by talking about plants.
What does Foot mean when she claims that the word good means the same thing when...
Question 1 1 pts What means the same thing as morally permissible? O Required Wrong not to do O Not wrong to do O Wrong to do Question 2 1 pts What does it mean to "maximize the good"? O Make things better than they were before. Choose that action that, among all of the options available to you at that time, brings about the most good. As long as you're trying to do what's right, that's okay. O Avoid...
If you have private-ownership rights to something, what does this mean? O It means that you can transfer, sell, or mortgage the good. O It means that you have the right to do anything vou want with the good O It means that you pald for the good O It means that you have the right to infringe on the rights of ochers Evaluate the foliowinG statem nt about how private ownershp nnuences he i centive ๙ ntivduals to deve...
Think about the concept of color blindness. Is it a good thing or a bad thing, neither or both? Is becoming color blind possible, impossible, necessary or not necessary? Does it depend on the situation? What What do the readings say about color blindness? How does colorblindness connect to bias? How would you define unconscious bias? What are your reactions to unconscious bias? What from the films and readings is evidence of the existence of unconscious bias?
Think about the concept of color blindness. Is it a good thing or a bad thing, neither or both? Is becoming color blind possible, impossible, necessary or not necessary? Does it depend on the situation? What What do the readings say about color blindness? How does colorblindness connect to bias? How would you define unconscious bias? What are your reactions to unconscious bias? What from the films and readings is evidence of the existence of unconscious bias? Search entries or...
Naomi Zack argues that race is a social construct and is dangerous. What does she mean by race being “socially constructed?” How does she argue in favor of it? Does she think this realization means that we should not think or speak of race anymore? a written essay 4 pages, double spaces.
Is dividing a government a good or bad thing? How can this problem be fixed? What happens when all three branches are controlled by the same party (think FDR)?
Does the unpredictability in the "micro world" means that everything is if we can look at it close enough imperfect? I mean, there is a saying "You will never stand in the same river again" or something like that. So, if nothing in our makro world is the same, if we look close enough (no two people or flowers are the same; and if they seem, it just means you are not looking carefully or cose enough ;) Is this...
1. What does the word professional impression means to you in relationship to a healthcare professional? What does the book sugest is a Rood way to handle making a mistake? Do you agree or disagree? Explain
What do you think Fanon means when he writes that speaking is to take on “the weight of a civilization,” and what does it mean when someone is forced to take on the language that is not his own?
what does the word for mean in accounting? For example “ I received cash for common stock” How would i know what to journal. and when journaling does it matter if increase or decrease or do i just do normal balance?