Question

Given a set S of integers, we say that S can be partitioned if it can...

Given a set S of integers, we say that S can be partitioned if it can be split into two sets U and V so that considering all u  U and all v  V, u = v. Let PARTITION = { | S can be partitioned }. a. (5) Show that PARTITION  NP by writing either a verifier or an NDTM. b. (15) Show that PARTITION is NP-complete by reduction from SUBSET-SUM.

0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

ANSWER :

< vs & Cheek that and unv= 0 a) PARTITION ONP - 7 Hence is a polynoucas - Alue Verci firem fore PARTITION: On input ( juiv):) Goven, partitions U, V jest sum the two and verify that their sem equals each other, which is obver dely a polynomear the tNotice that thee Endveres a nateral pare totoon P, and P2 of s, such that WLOG we have that X-2t + Exs Ex xepi - X-2t + TutAnd It is cleare to see that the transformation was done in polynomial teme. TITRON Es Np-com compute. Hence, PART تر0 کی

Hope it helps... please give an upvote. it's very important to me... thank you:)

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
Given a set S of integers, we say that S can be partitioned if it can...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • Given a set S of integers, we say that S can be partitioned if it can...

    Given a set S of integers, we say that S can be partitioned if it can be split into two sets U and V so that considering all u  U and all v  V, u = v. Let PARTITION = { <S> | S can be partitioned }. a. (5) Show that PARTITION  NP by writing either a verifier or an NDTM. b. (15) Show that PARTITION is NP-complete by reduction from SUBSET-SUM. 9.(20) Given a set...

  • Given a set S of integers, we say that S can be partitioned if it can...

    Given a set S of integers, we say that S can be partitioned if it can be split into two sets U and V so that considering all u ∈ U and all v ∈ V, Σu = Σ v. Let PARTITION = { <S>| S can be partitioned }. a. (5) Show that PARTITION ∈ NP by writing either a verifier or an NDTM b. (15) Show that PARTITION is NP-complete by reduction from SUBSET-SUM.

  • 9. (20) Given a set of integers, we say that can be partitioned if it can...

    9. (20) Given a set of integers, we say that can be partitioned if it can be split into two sets U and V so that considering all u EU and all v € V, Eu = Ev. Let PARTITION = {<s> S can be partitioned }. a. (5) Show that PARTITION € NP by writing either a verifier or an NDTM. b. (15) Show that PARTITION is NP-complete by reduction from SUBSET-SUM.

  • Given a set S of integers, we say that S can be partitioned if it can...

    Given a set S of integers, we say that S can be partitioned if it can be split into two sets U and V so that considering all u Î U and all v Î V, Su = Sv. Let PARTITION = { | S can be partitioned }. Show that PARTITION is NP-complete by reduction from SUBSET-SUM

  • Show that PARTITION  NP by writing either a verifier or an NDTM. Given a set...

    Show that PARTITION  NP by writing either a verifier or an NDTM. Given a set of integers, we say that can be partitioned if it can be split into two sets U and V so that considering all u EU and all v € V, Eu = Ev. Let PARTITION = {<s> S can be partitioned ). a. (5) Show that PARTITION E NP by writing either a verifier or an NDTM.

  • Show that PARTITION is NP-complete by reduction from SUBSET-SUM. Given a set of integers, we say...

    Show that PARTITION is NP-complete by reduction from SUBSET-SUM. Given a set of integers, we say that can be partitioned if it can be split into two sets U and V so that considering all u EU and all v € V, Eu = Ev. Let PARTITION = { <S> S can be partitioned ). Show that PARTITION IS NP-complete by reduction from SUBSET-SUM.

  • * SUBSET-SUM-kS, t> I S -[xi Xk] and for some lyı yn)cIxi.... xk) the sum of...

    * SUBSET-SUM-kS, t> I S -[xi Xk] and for some lyı yn)cIxi.... xk) the sum of the yi's equals t. For example, <S-2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 14], t-21> is in SUBSET-SUM because 3+7 11-21. xk) can be partitioned into two parts A and -A where -A * SET-PARTITION <S> S-Ixi S-A and the sum of the elements in A is equal to the sum of the elements in A. For example, 〈 S-12, 3, 4, 7, 8/> works because...

  • Problem 2. In the Subset-Sum problem the input consists of a set of positive integers X...

    Problem 2. In the Subset-Sum problem the input consists of a set of positive integers X = {x1, . . . , xn}, and some integer k. The answer is YES if and only if there exists some subset of X that sums to k. In the Bipartition problem the input consists of a set of positive integers Y = {y1, . . . , yn}. The answer is YES if and only if there exists some subset of X...

  • Let U be the set of all integers. Consider the following sets: S is the set...

    Let U be the set of all integers. Consider the following sets: S is the set of all even integers; T is the set of integers obtained by tripling any one integer and adding 1; V is the set of integers that are multiples of 2 and 3. a) Use set builder notation to describe S, T and V symbolically. b) Compute s n T, s n V and T V. Describe these sets using set builder notation

  • We know that MAJSAT is PP-complete. Is it generally true that given an NP-complete problem, its...

    We know that MAJSAT is PP-complete. Is it generally true that given an NP-complete problem, its majority variant is PP-complete? For example, MAJ-Set-Splitting: are the majority of partitions of items going to split the sets? MAJ-Subset-Sum: does the majority of partitions of items have a sum of exactly K? etc...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT