Given a set S of integers, we say that S can be partitioned if it can be split into two sets U and V so that considering all u U and all v V, u = v. Let PARTITION = { | S can be partitioned }. a. (5) Show that PARTITION NP by writing either a verifier or an NDTM. b. (15) Show that PARTITION is NP-complete by reduction from SUBSET-SUM.
ANSWER :
Hope it helps... please give an upvote. it's very important to me... thank you:)
Given a set S of integers, we say that S can be partitioned if it can...
Given a set S of integers, we say that S can be partitioned if it can be split into two sets U and V so that considering all u U and all v V, u = v. Let PARTITION = { <S> | S can be partitioned }. a. (5) Show that PARTITION NP by writing either a verifier or an NDTM. b. (15) Show that PARTITION is NP-complete by reduction from SUBSET-SUM. 9.(20) Given a set...
Given a set S of integers, we say that S can be partitioned if it can be split into two sets U and V so that considering all u ∈ U and all v ∈ V, Σu = Σ v. Let PARTITION = { <S>| S can be partitioned }. a. (5) Show that PARTITION ∈ NP by writing either a verifier or an NDTM b. (15) Show that PARTITION is NP-complete by reduction from SUBSET-SUM.
9. (20) Given a set of integers, we say that can be partitioned if it can be split into two sets U and V so that considering all u EU and all v € V, Eu = Ev. Let PARTITION = {<s> S can be partitioned }. a. (5) Show that PARTITION € NP by writing either a verifier or an NDTM. b. (15) Show that PARTITION is NP-complete by reduction from SUBSET-SUM.
Given a set S of integers, we say that S can be partitioned if it can be split into two sets U and V so that considering all u Î U and all v Î V, Su = Sv. Let PARTITION = { | S can be partitioned }. Show that PARTITION is NP-complete by reduction from SUBSET-SUM
Show that PARTITION NP by writing either a verifier or an NDTM. Given a set of integers, we say that can be partitioned if it can be split into two sets U and V so that considering all u EU and all v € V, Eu = Ev. Let PARTITION = {<s> S can be partitioned ). a. (5) Show that PARTITION E NP by writing either a verifier or an NDTM.
Show that PARTITION is NP-complete by reduction from SUBSET-SUM. Given a set of integers, we say that can be partitioned if it can be split into two sets U and V so that considering all u EU and all v € V, Eu = Ev. Let PARTITION = { <S> S can be partitioned ). Show that PARTITION IS NP-complete by reduction from SUBSET-SUM.
* SUBSET-SUM-kS, t> I S -[xi Xk] and for some lyı yn)cIxi.... xk) the sum of the yi's equals t. For example, <S-2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 14], t-21> is in SUBSET-SUM because 3+7 11-21. xk) can be partitioned into two parts A and -A where -A * SET-PARTITION <S> S-Ixi S-A and the sum of the elements in A is equal to the sum of the elements in A. For example, 〈 S-12, 3, 4, 7, 8/> works because...
Problem 2. In the Subset-Sum problem the input consists of a set of positive integers X = {x1, . . . , xn}, and some integer k. The answer is YES if and only if there exists some subset of X that sums to k. In the Bipartition problem the input consists of a set of positive integers Y = {y1, . . . , yn}. The answer is YES if and only if there exists some subset of X...
Let U be the set of all integers. Consider the following sets: S is the set of all even integers; T is the set of integers obtained by tripling any one integer and adding 1; V is the set of integers that are multiples of 2 and 3. a) Use set builder notation to describe S, T and V symbolically. b) Compute s n T, s n V and T V. Describe these sets using set builder notation
We know that MAJSAT is PP-complete. Is it generally true that given an NP-complete problem, its majority variant is PP-complete? For example, MAJ-Set-Splitting: are the majority of partitions of items going to split the sets? MAJ-Subset-Sum: does the majority of partitions of items have a sum of exactly K? etc...