Question

Given a set of integers, we say that can be partitioned if it can be split into two sets U and V so that considering all u EU Show that PARTITION is NP-complete by reduction from SUBSET-SUM.

0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

So! in the con Set one time en Venten Instance GIVE) Vi hasone Vertex un v A Solution just need to exhibit the vertices domiand UGU dehote Suppose it is possible to parlton the number of two parts u andu in such that su + IV II2/2 SS} and VEV the toif you have any doubt regarding this please let me know if you understand the solution then please give me a thumbs up thanks

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
Show that PARTITION is NP-complete by reduction from SUBSET-SUM. Given a set of integers, we say...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • Given a set S of integers, we say that S can be partitioned if it can...

    Given a set S of integers, we say that S can be partitioned if it can be split into two sets U and V so that considering all u  U and all v  V, u = v. Let PARTITION = { <S> | S can be partitioned }. a. (5) Show that PARTITION  NP by writing either a verifier or an NDTM. b. (15) Show that PARTITION is NP-complete by reduction from SUBSET-SUM. 9.(20) Given a set...

  • 9. (20) Given a set of integers, we say that can be partitioned if it can...

    9. (20) Given a set of integers, we say that can be partitioned if it can be split into two sets U and V so that considering all u EU and all v € V, Eu = Ev. Let PARTITION = {<s> S can be partitioned }. a. (5) Show that PARTITION € NP by writing either a verifier or an NDTM. b. (15) Show that PARTITION is NP-complete by reduction from SUBSET-SUM.

  • Given a set S of integers, we say that S can be partitioned if it can...

    Given a set S of integers, we say that S can be partitioned if it can be split into two sets U and V so that considering all u Î U and all v Î V, Su = Sv. Let PARTITION = { | S can be partitioned }. Show that PARTITION is NP-complete by reduction from SUBSET-SUM

  • Given a set S of integers, we say that S can be partitioned if it can...

    Given a set S of integers, we say that S can be partitioned if it can be split into two sets U and V so that considering all u  U and all v  V, u = v. Let PARTITION = { | S can be partitioned }. a. (5) Show that PARTITION  NP by writing either a verifier or an NDTM. b. (15) Show that PARTITION is NP-complete by reduction from SUBSET-SUM.

  • Show that PARTITION  NP by writing either a verifier or an NDTM. Given a set...

    Show that PARTITION  NP by writing either a verifier or an NDTM. Given a set of integers, we say that can be partitioned if it can be split into two sets U and V so that considering all u EU and all v € V, Eu = Ev. Let PARTITION = {<s> S can be partitioned ). a. (5) Show that PARTITION E NP by writing either a verifier or an NDTM.

  • Given a set S of integers, we say that S can be partitioned if it can...

    Given a set S of integers, we say that S can be partitioned if it can be split into two sets U and V so that considering all u ∈ U and all v ∈ V, Σu = Σ v. Let PARTITION = { <S>| S can be partitioned }. a. (5) Show that PARTITION ∈ NP by writing either a verifier or an NDTM b. (15) Show that PARTITION is NP-complete by reduction from SUBSET-SUM.

  • * SUBSET-SUM-kS, t> I S -[xi Xk] and for some lyı yn)cIxi.... xk) the sum of...

    * SUBSET-SUM-kS, t> I S -[xi Xk] and for some lyı yn)cIxi.... xk) the sum of the yi's equals t. For example, <S-2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 14], t-21> is in SUBSET-SUM because 3+7 11-21. xk) can be partitioned into two parts A and -A where -A * SET-PARTITION <S> S-Ixi S-A and the sum of the elements in A is equal to the sum of the elements in A. For example, 〈 S-12, 3, 4, 7, 8/> works because...

  • Problem 2. In the Subset-Sum problem the input consists of a set of positive integers X...

    Problem 2. In the Subset-Sum problem the input consists of a set of positive integers X = {x1, . . . , xn}, and some integer k. The answer is YES if and only if there exists some subset of X that sums to k. In the Bipartition problem the input consists of a set of positive integers Y = {y1, . . . , yn}. The answer is YES if and only if there exists some subset of X...

  • Show that the decision version of the knapsack problem is NP-complete. (Hint: In your reduction, make...

    Show that the decision version of the knapsack problem is NP-complete. (Hint: In your reduction, make use of the partition problem: given n positive integers, partition them into two disjoint subsets with the same sum of their elements. The partition problem is NP-complete.)

  • We know that MAJSAT is PP-complete. Is it generally true that given an NP-complete problem, its...

    We know that MAJSAT is PP-complete. Is it generally true that given an NP-complete problem, its majority variant is PP-complete? For example, MAJ-Set-Splitting: are the majority of partitions of items going to split the sets? MAJ-Subset-Sum: does the majority of partitions of items have a sum of exactly K? etc...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT