Muskogee Company uses a process-costing system. The company manufactures a product that is processed in two departments: Molding and Assembly. In the Molding Department, direct materials are added at the beginning of the process; in the Assembly Department, additional direct materials are added at the end of the process. In both departments, conversion costs are incurred uniformly throughout the process. As work is completed, it is transferred out. The following table summarizes the production activity and costs for February.
Molding Assembly
Beginning inventory
Physical units 10,000 8,000
Costs:
Transferred in --- $45,200
DM $22,000 ---
Conversion $13,800 $16,800
Current production
Units started 25,000 ?
Units transferred out 30,000 35,000
Costs:
Transferred in --- ?
DM $56,250 $39,550
Conversion $103,500 $136,500
Percentage of completion
Beginning inventory 40% 50%
Ending inventory 80 50
Required
Answer :
1. Molding Department
a. Physical flow schedule:
Units, beginning work in process......................................... 10,000
Units started in February...................................................... 25,000
Total units to account for..................................................... 35,000
Units completed and transferred out:
Started and completed..................................................... 20,000
From beginning work in process...................................... 10,000
Units, ending work in process.............................................. 5,000
Total units accounted for..................................................... 35,000
b. Equivalent units calculation:
Direct Conversion
Materials Costs
Units completed................................................................... 30,000 30,000
Add: Equivalent units in ending work in process 5,000 4,000
Total equivalent units........................................................... 35,000 34,000
c. Unit cost computation:
Costs charged to the department:
Direct Conversion
Materials Costs Total
Costs in beginning work in process.............. $22,000 $ 13,800 $ 35,800
Costs added by department......................... 56,250 103,500 159,750
Total costs.................................................... $78,250 $117,300 $195,550
Unit cost = Unit direct materials cost + Unit conversion costs
= $78,250/35,000 + $117,300/34,000
= $2.2357* + $3.45
= $5.6857
*Rounded.
d. and e.
Total costs accounted for:
Cost of goods transferred out (30,000 × $5.6857)................. $170,571
Costs in ending work in process:
Direct materials (5,000 × $2.2357)..................................... $ 11,179*
Conversion costs (4,000 × $3.45)....................................... 13,800
Total costs in ending work in process..................................... 24,979
Total costs accounted for........................................................ $195,550
*Rounded.
Costs to account for:
Beginning work in process...................................................... $ 35,800
Costs incurred......................................................................... 159,750
Total costs to account for........................................................ $195,550
2. Journal entries:
Work in Process—Molding........................................... 56,250
Materials Inventory................................................ 56,250
Work in Process—Molding........................................... 103,500
Conversion Costs—Control.................................. 103,500*
Work in Process—Assembly......................................... 170,571
Work in Process—Molding................................... 170,571
*Conversion costs are not broken into direct labor and overhead components. Thus, a controlling account for conversion costs is used. This reflects the practice of some firms, which are now combining overhead and direct labor costs into one category (often because direct labor is a small percentage of total manufacturing costs).
3. Assembly Department
a. Physical flow schedule:
Units, beginning work in process......................................... 8,000
Units started in February (transferred in)............................. 30,000
Total units to account for..................................................... 38,000
Units completed and transferred out:
Started and completed..................................................... 27,000
From beginning work in process...................................... 8,000
Units, ending work in process.............................................. 3,000
Total units accounted for..................................................... 38,000
b. Equivalent units calculation:
Direct Conversion Transferred
Materials Costs In
Units completed........................................... 35,000 35,000 35,000
Add: Equivalent units in ending
work in process........................................ 0 1,500 3,000
Total equivalent units................................... 35,000 36,500 38,000
c. Unit cost calculation:
Costs charged to the department:
Direct Conversion Transferred
Materials Costs In Total
Costs in beginning work
in process.............................. $ 0 $ 16,800 $ 45,200 $ 62,000
Costs added............................ 39,550 136,500 170,571 346,621
Total costs............................... $39,550 $153,300 $215,771 $408,621
Unit cost = Unit direct materials cost + Unit conversion costs +
Unit transferred-in cost
= $39,550/35,000 + $153,300/36,500 + $215,771/38,000
= $1.13 + $4.20 + $5.6782*
= $11.0082
*Rounded.
d. and e.
Total costs accounted for:
Units transferred out (35,000 × $11.0082).......................... $385,287
Costs in ending work in process:
Direct materials................................................................ $ 0
Conversion costs (1,500 × $4.20).................................... 6,300
Transferred in (3,000 × $5.6782)..................................... 17,035*
Total costs in ending work in process.................................. 23,335
Total costs accounted for..................................................... $408,622*
*Rounded.
Costs to account for:
Beginning work in process................................................... $ 62,000
Costs incurred...................................................................... 346,621
Total costs to account for..................................................... $408,621*
*Difference due to rounding.
Journal entries:
Work in Process—Assembly................................. 39,550
Materials Inventory........................................ 39,550
Work in Process—Assembly................................. 136,500
Conversion Costs—Control.......................... 136,500*
Finished Goods...................................................... 385,287
Work in Process—Assembly......................... 385,287
*Conversion costs are not broken into direct labor and overhead components. Thus, a controlling account for conversion costs is used. This reflects the practice of some firms, which are now combining overhead and direct labor costs into one category (often because direct labor is a small percentage of total manufacturing costs).
Muskogee Company uses a process-costing system. The company manufactures a product that is processed in two...
Muskoge Company uses a process-costing system. The company manufactures a product that is processed in two departments: Molding and Assembly. In the Molding Department, direct materials are added at the beginning of the process; in the Assembly Department, additional direct materials are added at the end of the process. In both departments, conversion costs are incurred uniformly throughout the process. As work is completed, it is transferred out. The following table summarizes the production activity and costs for February: Beginning...
Muskoge Company uses a process-costing system. The company manufactures a product that is processed in two departments: Molding and Assembly. In the Molding Department, direct materials are added at the beginning of the process; in the Assembly Department, additional direct materials are added at the end of the process. In both departments, conversion costs are incurred uniformly throughout the process. As work is completed, it is transferred out. The following table summarizes the production activity and costs for February: Molding...
FIFO Method, Two-Department Analysis Muskoge Company uses a process-costing system. The company manufactures a product that is processed in two departments: Molding and Assembly. In the Molding Department, direct materials are added at the beginning of the process; in the Assembly Department, additional direct materials are added at the end of the process. In both departments, conversion costs are incurred uniformly throughout the process. As work is completed, it is transferred out. The following table summarizes the production activity and...
FIFO Method, Two-Department Analysis Muskoge Company uses a process-costing system. The company manufactures a product that is processed in two departments: Molding and Assembly. In the Molding Department, direct materials are added at the beginning of the process; in the Assembly Department, additional direct materials are added at the end of the process. In both departments, conversion costs are incurred uniformly throughout the process. As work is completed, it is transferred out. The following table summarizes the production activity and...
Weighted Average Method, Journal Entries Muskoge Company uses a process-costing system. The company manufactures a product that is processed in two departments: Molding and Assembly. In the Molding Department, direct materials are added at the beginning of the process; in the Assembly Department, additional direct materials are added at the end of the process. In both departments, conversion costs are incurred uniformly throughout the process. As work is completed, it is transferred out. The following table summarizes the production activity...
Weighted Average Method, Journal Entries Muskoge Company uses a process-costing system. The company manufactures a product that is processed in two departments: Molding and Assembly. In the Molding Department, direct materials are added at the beginning of the process; in the Assembly Department, additional direct materials are added at the end of the process. In both departments, conversion costs are incurred uniformly throughout the process. As work is completed, it is transferred out. The following table summarizes the production activity...
FIFO Muskoge Company FIFO Method, Two-Department Analysis Muskoge Company uses a process-costing system. The company manufactures a product that is processed in two departments: Molding and Assembly. In the Molding Department, direct materials are added at the beginning of the process; in the Assembly Department, additional direct materials are added at the end of the process. In both departments, conversion costs are incurred uniformly throughout the process. As work is completed, it is transferred out. The following table summarizes the...
Muskoge Company uses a process-costing system. The company manufactures a product that is processed in two departments: Molding and Assembly. In the Molding Department, direct materials are added at the beginning of the process; in the Assembly Department, additional direct materials are added at the end of the process. In both departments, conversion costs are incurred uniformly throughout the process. As work is completed, it is transferred out. The following table summarizes the production activity and costs for February:MoldingAssemblyBeginning inventories: Physical...
The same problem under FIFO method Muskoge Company uses a process-costing system. The company manufactures a product that is processed in two departments: Molding and Assembly, In the Molding Department, direct materials are added at the beginning of the process; in the Assembly Department, additional direct materials are added at the end of the process. In both departments, conversion costs are incurred uniformly throughout the process. As work is completed, it is transferred out. The following table summarizes the production...
Seacrest Company uses a process costing system. The company manufactures a product that is processed in two departments: A and B. As work is completed, is transferred out. All inputs are added uniformly in Department A The following summarizes the production activity and costs for November Department A Department B Beginning inventories: Physical units 5,000 8,000 Costs: Transferred in $45,320 Direct materials $10.000 Conversion costs $6.900 $16,800 Current production: 25,000 Units started ? Units transferred out 28.000 33.000 Costs: ?...