Question

PROJECT MANAGEMENT CASE - ASAP The Home Improvement Project Lukas Nelson and his wife, Anne, and...

PROJECT MANAGEMENT CASE - ASAP

The Home Improvement Project

Lukas Nelson and his wife, Anne, and their three daughters had been living in their house for over five years when they decided it was time to make some modest improvements. One area they both agreed needed an upgrade was the bathtub. Their current house had one standard shower/bathtub combination. Lukas was 6 feet four and could barely squeeze into it. In fact, he had taken only one bath since they moved in. He and Anne both missed soaking in the older, deep bathtubs they enjoyed when they lived back East.

Fortunately, the previous owners, who had built the house, had plumbed the corner of a large exercise room in the basement for a hot tub. They contacted a trusted remodeling contractor, who assured them it would be relatively easy to install a new bathtub and it shouldn’t cost more than $1,500. They decided to go ahead with the project.

First the Nelsons went to the local plumbing retailer to pick out a tub. They soon realized that for a few hundred dollars more they could buy a big tub with water jets (a Jacuzzi). With old age on the horizon a Jacuzzi seemed like a luxury that was worth the extra money.

Originally the plan was to install the tub using the simple plastic frame the bath came with and install a splash guard around the tub. Once Anne saw the tub, frame, and splashguard in the room she balked. She did not like how it looked with the cedar paneling in the exercise room. After significant debate, Anne won out, and the Nelsons agreed to pay extra to have a cedar frame built for the tub and use attractive tile instead of plastic splashguard. Lukas rationalized that the changes would pay for themselves when they tried to sell the house.

The next hiccup occurred when it came time to address the flowing issue. The exercise room was carpeted, which wasn’t ideal when getting out of a bathtub. The original idea was to install relatively cheap laminated flooring in the drying and addressing area adjacent to the tub. However, the Nelsons couldn’t agree on the pattern to use. One of Anne’s friends said it would be a shame to put such cheap flooring in such a nice room. She felt they should consider using tile. The contractor agreed and said he knew a tile installer who needed work and would give them a good deal.

Once the tub was installed and the framing was almost completed. Anne realized that something had to be done about the lighting. One of her favorite things to do was to read while soaking in the tub. The existing lights didn’t provide sufficient illumination for doing so. Lukas knew this was “nonnegotiable” and they hired an electrician to install additional lighting over the bathtub.

While the lighting was being installed and the tile was being laid, another issue came up. The original plan was to tile only the exercise room and use remnant rugs to cover the area away from the tub where the Nelsons did their exercises. The Nelsons were very happy with how the tile looked and fir with the overall room. However, it clashed with the laminated flowing in the adjacent bathroom. Lukas agreed with Anne that it really made the adjacent bathroom look cheap and ugly. He also felt the bathroom was so small it wouldn’t cost much more.

After a week the work was completed. Both Lukas and Anne were quite pleased with how everything turned out. It cost much more than they had planned, but they planned to live in the house until the girls graduated from college, so they felt it was a good ling-term investment.

Anne had the first turn using the bathtub, followed by their three girls. Everyone enjoyed the Jacuzzi. It was 10:00 p.m. when Lukas began running water for his first bath. At first the water was steaming hot, but by the time he was about to get in, it was lukewarm at best. Lukas groaned, “After paying all of that money I still can’t enjoy a bath.”

The Nelsons rationed bathing for a couple weeks, until they decided to find out what, if anything could be done about the hot water problem. They asked a reputable heating contractor to assess the situation. The contractor reported that the hot water tans was insufficient to service a family of five. This had not been discovered before because baths were rarely taken in the past. The contractor said it would cost $2,200 to replace the existing water heater with a larger one that would meet their needs. The heating contractor also said if they wanted to do it right they should replace the existing furnace with a more energy-efficient one. A new furnace would not only heat the house but also indirectly heat the water tank. Such a furnace would cost $7,500, but with the improved efficiency and savings in the gas bill, the furnace would pay for itself in 10 years. Besides, the Nelsons would likely receive tax credits for the more fuel-efficient furnace.

Three weeks later, after the new furnace was installed, Lukas settled into the new bathtub. He looked around the room at all the changes that had been made and muttered to himself, “And to think that all I wanted was to soak in a nice, hot bath.”

What factors and forces contributed to scope creep in this case? How could scope creep have been better managed by the Nelsons?

0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

ANSWER

The unplanned continual adjustment to the complexity of the project is termed complexity creep which often results in adjustments to the project's announced timelines and budget. Nelson and his family were just planning to repair the bathroom and contact the contractor who gave his quotation. Nonetheless, there are several problems occurring one after the other without proper review, resulting in increased implementation costs. The bathroom project had a clear view but slowly began to move out of control as planned, instead of a bathroom, to change the floors, lighting and jacuzzis. In this scenario, the cause for scope creep is attributed to badly specified original design without athletic review of criteria and cost-benefit analyses because the contractor was noteworthy in predicting various scope creeps that might arise before the project began.

For any change of the schedule, there are two things the Nelsons would have changed and neither of them were changed. The first is to come up with an approximate transition target so they can ask themselves whether a financial outlook makes sense for the transition. The tillage, for eg, it was decided that the contractor "knew a tile manufacturer who wanted help and would give them a decent price." The second thing that they would have known for any job adjustment was the impact of the adjustment on the overall product. We did not recognize the effect of a Jacuzzi on the hot water system at any stage in the preparation, and its added temperature requirements.Perhaps they didn't acknowledge their effect on the adjoining bathroom as they decided to tile the workout room. Along with their poor initial planning, this lack of planning caused them to spend far more on the project than they had planned.

PLEASE LIKE THIS ANSWER, IF ITS USEFUL TO YOU! THANK YOU!

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
PROJECT MANAGEMENT CASE - ASAP The Home Improvement Project Lukas Nelson and his wife, Anne, and...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • Case: J.R. was arrested 3 days ago because he is accused of murdering his wife. At...

    Case: J.R. was arrested 3 days ago because he is accused of murdering his wife. At approximately 2:42 am on that night, neighbors of J.R. called police because they heard screaming coming from inside the house. Upon arrival, police found a gruesome scene – J.R.’s wife was found dead inside of bathtub in the master bathroom. She had been stabbed 38 times. The murder weapon, a switchblade, was found inside of a plastic bag at the bottom of the bathroom...

  • MEXICAN CASE STUDY #2 Pablo Gaborra, aged 32, and his wife, Olga, aged 24, live in...

    MEXICAN CASE STUDY #2 Pablo Gaborra, aged 32, and his wife, Olga, aged 24, live in a migrant-worker camp on the eastern shore of Maryland. They have two children: Roberto, aged 7, and Linda, aged 18 months. Olga’s two younger sisters, Florencia, aged 16, and Rosa, aged 12, live with them. Another distant relative, Rodolpho, aged 28, comes and goes several times each year and seems to have no fixed address. Pablo and Olga, born in Mexico, have lived in...

  • MEXICAN CASE STUDY #2 Pablo Gaborra, aged 32, and his wife, Olga, aged 24, live in...

    MEXICAN CASE STUDY #2 Pablo Gaborra, aged 32, and his wife, Olga, aged 24, live in a migrant-worker camp on the eastern shore of Maryland. They have two children: Roberto, aged 7, and Linda, aged 18 months. Olga’s two younger sisters, Florencia, aged 16, and Rosa, aged 12, live with them. Another distant relative, Rodolpho, aged 28, comes and goes several times each year and seems to have no fixed address. Pablo and Olga, born in Mexico, have lived in...

  • MEXICAN CASE STUDY #2 Pablo Gaborra, aged 32, and his wife, Olga, aged 24, live in...

    MEXICAN CASE STUDY #2 Pablo Gaborra, aged 32, and his wife, Olga, aged 24, live in a migrant-worker camp on the eastern shore of Maryland. They have two children: Roberto, aged 7, and Linda, aged 18 months. Olga’s two younger sisters, Florencia, aged 16, and Rosa, aged 12, live with them. Another distant relative, Rodolpho, aged 28, comes and goes several times each year and seems to have no fixed address. Pablo and Olga, born in Mexico, have lived in...

  • Project 7-1: Classify Patient Incidents According to Policy This primary source of information on patient safety...

    Project 7-1: Classify Patient Incidents According to Policy This primary source of information on patient safety will be used to analyze the incidents according to level of severity. The following policies define the three categories of severity Policy on Level I Event: An incident that resulted in patient death or serious short or long-term (6 weeks or more) disability or harm Policy on Level II Event: An incident that resulted in minimal short-term patient disability or harm Policy on Level...

  • I have this case study to solve. i want to ask which type of case study...

    I have this case study to solve. i want to ask which type of case study in this like problem, evaluation or decision? if its decision then what are the criterias and all? Stardust Petroleum Sendirian Berhad: how to inculcate the pro-active safety culture? Farzana Quoquab, Nomahaza Mahadi, Taram Satiraksa Wan Abdullah and Jihad Mohammad Coming together is a beginning; keeping together is progress; working together is success. - Henry Ford The beginning Stardust was established in 2013 as a...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT