Consider the following two statements. A, B, C denote arbitrary quantities. One claim is true and the other is false. Prove what is true and show that what is false is really false by producing three quantities A, B, C that meet the assumptions but not the conclusion. ( Venn diagram Proof not allowed)
i) A ⊕ C = ∅ ∧ A ∩ B ∩ C = ∅ ⇒ A ∪ C = ∅
ii) A ∩ C = ∅ ∧ B ⊂ A ∪ C ⇒ B ⊂ A ⊕ C.
bb
We need at least 9 more requests to produce the answer.
1 / 10 have requested this problem solution
The more requests, the faster the answer.
help please and thank you 5. True or False. For each of the following statements, determine whether the statement is True or False and then prove your assertion. That is, for each True statement provide a proof, and for each False statement provide a counterexample (with explanation). Hint: Draw appropriate Venn diagrams to aid your explorations! Let A, B and C be sets (a) A - (B C) (A - B) C (b) (А — В) — С - (А-С)...
Proofs are not necessary Exercise 6.8.12. Determine if the following statements are true or false. If a statement is true, prove it. If a statement is false, give a counterexample or some other proof showing it is false. Unless otherwise specified, let V and W be a finite-dimensional vector space over field F, let (v1, ..., Un} be a basis of V, let {1,...,n} be a subset of W (possibly with repeated vectors), and let 6: V W be the...
The answer is C. Can someone give me a detailed explanation of why the first statement is false? 2. [2 marks] Consider the following two statements: I. Nominal GDP in a year is always larger than real GDP in the same year if there is inflation. II. The quantities produced of nominal GDP in a year and the quantities produced of real GDP in the same year are always the same A. Statement I. is TRUE and Statement II. is...
3. In this problem we consider only functions defined on the real numbers R A function f is close to a function g if r e Rs.t. Vy E R, A function f visits a function g when Vr E R, 3y E R s.t. For a given function f and n E N, let us denote by fn the following function: Below are three claims. Which ones are true and which ones are false? If a claim is true,...
2) (i) State the converse of the Alternate Interior Angle Theorem in Neutral Geometry. (ii) Prove that if the converse of the Alternate Interior Angle Theorem is true, then all triangles have zero defect. [Hint: For an arbitrary triangle, ABC, draw a line through C parallel to side AB. Justify why you can do this.] 5) Consider the following statements: I: If two triangles are congruent, then they have equal defect. II: If two triangles are similar, then they have...
3. Let W = P({1,2,3,4,5}). Consider the following statement and attempted proof: VAE W WB EW (((AUB) C A) + (ACB)) (1) Towards a universal generalization argument, choose arbitrary A € W, BEW. (2) We need to show ((AUB) C A) + (ACB). (3) Towards a proof by contraposition, assume B CA, and we need to show A C (AUB). (4) By definition of subset inclusion, this means we need to show Vc (E A →r (AUB)). (5) Towards a...
14. True or False Aa Aa Use your knowledge of natural deduction in propositional logic and your knowledge of the rules of implication to determine wichof the following statements are true. Place a check mark in the box beside each true statement. You cannot apply any rules of implication to parts of whole lines The addition (Add) rule always yields a disjunction as its conclusion. Addition (Add) allows you to connect together with a dot the propositions on any previous...
13. Natural Deduction Practice 9 Aa Aa As you learn additional natural deduction rules, and as the proofs you will need to complete become more complex, it is important that you develop your ability to think several steps ahead to determine what intermediate steps will be necessary to reach the argument's conclusion Completing complex natural deduction proofs requires the ability to recognize basic argument patterns in groups of compound statements and often requires that you "reason backwards" from the conclusion...
Validate each of the following proofs by evaluating each of the following. Foundation for the proof . a. Statement of what the author intends to show. b. Description, in your own words, of what the statement implies. c. Intuitive justification as to why this is likely to be true. Structure of the proof. . Identify what the author stated as a logical implication. What foundational assumptions will the author make? What will the author be required to demonstrate? Describe the...
10. Which is true of the standard form categorical syllogism? a) Middle term must be in figure 1 b) At least one of the statements must be affirmative. c) Major premise should be written first and then minor premise follows. d) The syllogism is always valid. 11. A Venn diagram for a syllogism has three overlapping circles with ___ clearly distinguishable areas. a) 5 b) 6 c) 7 d) 8 12. Which area is shaded on the Venn diagram of...