Question

write like two paragraphs , discussing the premium subsidies and healthcare in the marketplace, pay particular attention to the Supreme Court ruling of King v. Burwell. Make sure that you properly cite any and all sources.

Answer 1

A judgment was passed by the U.S. Supreme Court on June 25, 2015 in the King v. Burwell case to consider health law subsidies. The petitioners challenged the legality of premium and cost sharing subsidies for low and middle income people buying health plans in 34 states where the federal government in the states is operating an insurance marketplace established by the Affordable Care Act.

The petitioners protested that there has been disparities which were partly addressed in the United States in 2010 by statement of the Affordable Care Act. The Act mentioned that the low and moderate income individuals and families with incomes between the federal poverty level are eligible for insurance premium subsidies when purchasing policies on the health insurance marketplace exchanges.

Since the act was passed, nearly 16.5 million Americans have gained health insurance.

In 2015, the act survived with the last significant judicial challenge to the law in the case of King v. Burwell. The petitioners challenged whether people who purchased health insurance in states, use the federal insurance marketplace of HealthCare, rather than a state run marketplace, who are eligible to receive insurance premium subsidies.

But in the process as per the petitioners insistence if 34 states would have used the federal exchange, then the result would be that nearly 7.5 million people could have lost their health insurance if the court had passed the judgment in favor of the petitioners.

However, in the case of King v. Burwell, the Court considered six to three aspects in support of the legality of subsidies irrespective of type of marketplace states use, which ensured continued health insurance coverage for patients in states using the federal marketplace exchange.

Similarly in 2015, the Supreme Court also passed a judgment in a landmark case, in which the Court protected the right for two people of the same sex to marry, thereby opening crucial access to both state and federal benefits and protections for same sex couples.