Patient infringement case. Refer to the Chance (Fall 2002) study of a patent infringement case brought against Intel Corp., presented in Exercise 7.18 (p. 367). Recall that the case rested on whether a patent witness’ signature was written on top of key text in a patent notebook or under the key text. Using an X-ray beam, zinc measurements were taken at several spots on the notebook page. The zinc measurements for three notebook locations—on a text line, on a witness line, and on the intersection of the witness and text lines—are reproduced in the following table:
PATENT
Text line: | .335 | .374 | .440 | ||
Witness line: | .210 | .262 | .188 | .329 | .439 .397 |
Intersection: | .393 | .353 | .285 | .295 | .319 |
a. Why might the Student’s t-procedure you applied in Exercise 9.20 be inappropriate for analyzing these data?
b. Use a nonparametric test (at α = .05) to compare the distribution of zinc measurements for the text line with the distribution for the intersection.
c. Use a nonparametric test (at α = .05) to compare the distribution of zinc measurements for the witness line with the distribution for the intersection.
d. From the results you obtained in parts b and c, what can you infer about the mean zinc measurements at the three notebook locations?
Exercise 7.18
We need at least 10 more requests to produce the solution.
0 / 10 have requested this problem solution
The more requests, the faster the answer.