Question

6) In your opinion, who is a better band: The Beatles or The Rolling Stones. Explain your answer using terminology from the book

Answer 1

The Beatles Are Better Than The Rolling Stones These bands have more in common than their respective critics recognize: they are both British, they both grew up with American rock' n' roll records that made up their early repertoires and both shaped music as we know it from the 20th century. But at every stage, only one band continued to cut new paths: the Beatles.

This is not to erase anything from the greatest achievements of the' 60s and' 70s of the Rolling Stones. In reality, the four-year series of classic records from the group beginning with' Beggars Banquet' and ending with' Exile on Main St.' has never been matched, and will likely never be. They were often called "the world's best rock' n' roll group," and there was no questioning the statement for a long stretch. But the Beatles first got there. Where the Stones were professionals, they were innovators. Chuck Berry was covered by the Stones, but a few years earlier the Beatles did the same.

The Stones invented the single rock' n' roll art in the mid-60s, just like the Beatles did a few months ago. And the Stones dabbled on the clumsily performed' Their Satanic Majesties Demand ' album in psychedelic music, following a pattern laid out on the revelatory' Sgt' of the Beatles. The Lonely Hearts Club Band of Pepper.'

In a way, their legend was sealed by the breakup of the Beatles in 1970. They went out just as creatively they started to stumble. Had the Stones broken down after they made ' Exile on Main St., ' this debate might be in the opposite direction. But for 40 more years they have trudged on.