Question

How to apply Contingency theory/ (ies) of leadership to a named pharmaceutical organisation? (500-800 owrds)

Answer 1

Contingency theory of leadership to a named pharmaceutical organisation is an organizational theory that states that there is no best way to organize a corporation, manage a company, or make decisions. Instead, the optimal action depends on the internal and external conditions. A competent leader applies his or her own leadership style to the right situation.
An organization is an open system that needs careful management to meet and balance internal needs and adapt to environmental circumstances.
There is no best way to prepare. The appropriate form depends on the type of task or environment in which the person is involved.
Management must focus primarily on achieving good alignment and seizures.
Different types or types of organizations are needed in different types of environments.
Organizational theory has several approaches to organizational analysis. An organization is defined as a social unit of people that is structured and managed to meet needs or pursue common goals. Organizational theories include rational system perspectives, labor division, bureaucratic theory, and contingency theory.

In a rational system, there are two main parts: goal specificity and formal formatting. The division of labor is a skill of the individual job role associated with increasing productivity and trade. Modernization theorist Frank Dobbin says, "Modern institutions are transparent and we are in the process of evolving into a more efficient form."

Max Weber's bureaucratic concept is characterized by the presence of informal positions that are won and not inherited, professional decisions, chains of specific responsibilities and limited powers. The theory of forecasting states that an organization should strive to increase its capacity by minimizing the impact of environmental and other environmental impacts. Organizational theories are characterized by hereditary, assertive, and assertive forms. ”And since then, greater reasoning has evolved in theory and practice, and organizational theory can never be described as progressive. The correctness of an idea or a single group of knowledge. On the contrary, the development of theories and practices of practice shows that there are differences of opinion about the goals and the application of the theory of an organization, a problem that it has to solve on its own (in the form of an organization). Control and organizational culture) and concepts and variables that should be incorporated into a theory.

Weber identified the following key components of bureaucracy:

Formal jurisdiction for all regions is determined by existing rules or regulations.
Has an office hierarchy; A system of oversight and coordination in which higher services manage subordinates.
The management of modern offices is based on written rules that are kept in their original form.
Office management requires training and skills.
When an office is developed / established, it requires the full working capacity of the people.
The rules are stable and can be learned. Knowledge of these laws can be seen as a skill in the bureaucracy (they allow society to govern).

When bureaucracy is implemented, it can ensure accountability, accountability, management and stability. Hiring employees will be a system that is not fair and equitable.

Although classical perspectives drive efficiency, it is often criticized for ignoring human needs. In addition, human error or variability in work results are rarely taken into account (because each worker is different).