Question

How did the Supreme Court ruling in the Susan Kelo et al., Petitioners, v. City of...

How did the Supreme Court ruling in the Susan Kelo et al., Petitioners, v. City of New London, Connecticut, et al. (Kelo) case influence the government's ability to exercise eminent domain?

0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

Ans) Government in Susan Kelo case affirmed that the seizure of private property by the government on the name of development is consistent with Public use clause (fifth amendment) which states that no person shall be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law nor shall the private property be taken away without paying just compensation.

Hence this judgement put a restraint on government that it cannot simply take away the private property. If it wants to do so he will have to follow due process of law and provide just compensation to the owner.

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
How did the Supreme Court ruling in the Susan Kelo et al., Petitioners, v. City of...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • Analyse the Supreme Court's ruling in Bakke v. California.  What elements did the Court use to define...

    Analyse the Supreme Court's ruling in Bakke v. California.  What elements did the Court use to define that Reverse Discrimination had taken place? What becomes the new standard for Race in College Admissions?

  • Activity Read this overview of the court case Kelo v. City of New London. Then answer...

    Activity Read this overview of the court case Kelo v. City of New London. Then answer the questions that follow. Be sure to have an online dictionary open as you read to help you with words that may be unfamiliar. Question 1 Part A What was the rationale for this project?

  • The Supreme Court recently reinforced this idea with their ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election...

    The Supreme Court recently reinforced this idea with their ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. In this decision, the court overturned historic laws that sought to minimize corporate influence over elected officials by limiting corporate campaign contributions. This ruling is based on the argument that the limitation of corporate campaign contributions constitutes a violation of these "individual's'" constitutional right to free speech. In this forum, do independent research about this controversial decision and its relevance to to current...

  • CASE 3.1 Eminent Domain SUSETTE KELO'S NONDESCRIPT, PINK CLAPBOARD Kil'I, MINK CLAPBOARD house sits above the...

    CASE 3.1 Eminent Domain SUSETTE KELO'S NONDESCRIPT, PINK CLAPBOARD Kil'I, MINK CLAPBOARD house sits above the Thames River in the Fort Trumbull area of New London, Connecticut. It's surrounded by vacant lots, where neighbors once lived. One by one, these neighbors have left, and their homes have been razed. Their property has been taken over by the City of New London, which has used its power of eminent domain to clear the land where dozens of homes once stood in...

  • How did the Supreme Court judges react to New Deal laws? Which of the following is...

    How did the Supreme Court judges react to New Deal laws? Which of the following is correct? A. They invalidated key initiatives, as conservative judges continued to understand freedom as liberty of contract. B. They sided with Roosevelt and ruled in favor of new legislation. C. Some supported the New Deal's policies and some did not. D. They tended to support economic changes, but not social ones.

  • a] Read the New York Times article, “In Narrow Decision, Supreme Court Sides With Baker Who...

    a] Read the New York Times article, “In Narrow Decision, Supreme Court Sides With Baker Who Turned Away Couple” . Briefly summarize the case. b] Use as many specific concepts and contents from this course to develop your argument either in favor or against that Supreme Court ruling. c] Can you identify any direct and/or indirect violence associated with this conflict? Article: WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Monday ruled in favor of a Colorado baker who had refused to...

  • REGER DEVELOPMENT, LLC V. NATIONAL CITY BANK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS, SEVENTH CIRCUIT 592 F.3d...

    REGER DEVELOPMENT, LLC V. NATIONAL CITY BANK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS, SEVENTH CIRCUIT 592 F.3d 759 (2010) FACTS: Reger Development borrowed money from National City Bank, using a revolving line of credit supported by a promissory note. At the point that National City discussed the possibility of calling the note, Reger Development sued the bank for breach of contract and fraud. The district court granted National City’s motion to dismiss Reger’s complaint. Reger had met with the bank prior...

  • Hazen Paper Co. v. Biggins 507 U.S. 604 (1993) The Supreme Court resolved a split among...

    Hazen Paper Co. v. Biggins 507 U.S. 604 (1993) The Supreme Court resolved a split among the circuits in the following case, where it confronted the question of whether an employer violates the ADEA where factors other than age motivate the adverse employment decision. The Hazens hired Walter Biggins in 1977 and fired him in 1986 when he was 62 years old. Biggins sued, alleging a violation of the ADEA. The Hazens claimed instead that they terminated him because he...

  • CASE BRIEF 6.2 Hornbeck Offshore Services, L.L.C. et al., v. Salazar 696 F. Supp.2d 627 (E.D....

    CASE BRIEF 6.2 Hornbeck Offshore Services, L.L.C. et al., v. Salazar 696 F. Supp.2d 627 (E.D. La. 2010) FACTS: Hornbeck and others (plaintiffs) provide services to support offshore oil and gas drilling, exploration, and production activities in the Gulf of Mexico. Kenneth Salazar is the Secretary of the Department of Interior (DOI), a federal agency that includes the Minerals Management. Following the BP Deepwater Horizon drilling platform explosion on April 20, 2010, and the resulting devastation and unprecedented disaster, the...

  • Review the following court case: Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co. 419 U.S. 345(1974) 1. What are...

    Review the following court case: Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co. 419 U.S. 345(1974) 1. What are the facts of this case? What is the issue? 2. In what court was it decided, and how did it get to that court? 3. What did the court below decide, and why? What did this court decide, and why? 4. What does it mean to be "affected with the public interest"? 5. What is the significance of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S....

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT