Question

Analyse the Supreme Court's ruling in Bakke v. California.  What elements did the Court use to define...

Analyse the Supreme Court's ruling in Bakke v. California.  What elements did the Court use to define that Reverse Discrimination had taken place? What becomes the new standard for Race in College Admissions?

0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

On June 28, 1978 the U.S. Supreme Court ruling on Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 is considered to be a landmark decision. The "reverse discrimination" was sued by Bakke because few of the admitted minorities had lower scores and lower grade point averages on the Medical College Admission Test compared to him. He alleged that the medical school's policy on admission violated Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause. The ruling stated that use of racial "quotas" by a university's in its process of admissions was unconstitutional, however usage of affirmative action by school for accepting more applicants in minority was constitutional in certain circumstances. In this case the use of racial quotas violated the Constitution's Equal Protection Clause as for no other reason it intended to prefer one group other than ethnic or race origin. Regents of this case established a pragmatic approach of reconciliation of good-intentioned quota and affirmative action programs with the Constitution's zealous equality protection. Since this ruling it has established a new standard for Race in College Admissions as private and public universities have crafted affirmative action programs which remain consistent with Bakke's requirements

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
Analyse the Supreme Court's ruling in Bakke v. California.  What elements did the Court use to define...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • How did the Supreme Court ruling in the Susan Kelo et al., Petitioners, v. City of...

    How did the Supreme Court ruling in the Susan Kelo et al., Petitioners, v. City of New London, Connecticut, et al. (Kelo) case influence the government's ability to exercise eminent domain?

  • In Dartmouth College v. Woodward, decided Feb. 2, 1819, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the legal...

    In Dartmouth College v. Woodward, decided Feb. 2, 1819, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the legal personhood of corporations as an essential principle of American law. In a decision by Chief Justice John Marshall, the court found for the school over the state of New Hampshire's takeover. According to Marshall, the court was duty-bound to defend the college's independence because its corporate charter was protected by the Constitution's prohibition on state laws "impairing the obligation of contracts." Dartmouth as an...

  • One of the most important Title VII civil rights cases is McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green,...

    One of the most important Title VII civil rights cases is McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973).  This case basically established what the burden of proof must be in order for someone to prove discrimination. Like most lawsuits, this case started out with a disgruntled employee, Percy Green. Mr. Green claimed that his employer, McDonnel-Douglas, had discriminated against him based on his race. This assignment will take you through the long legal history of this case. Don’t worry...

  • a] Read the New York Times article, “In Narrow Decision, Supreme Court Sides With Baker Who...

    a] Read the New York Times article, “In Narrow Decision, Supreme Court Sides With Baker Who Turned Away Couple” . Briefly summarize the case. b] Use as many specific concepts and contents from this course to develop your argument either in favor or against that Supreme Court ruling. c] Can you identify any direct and/or indirect violence associated with this conflict? Article: WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Monday ruled in favor of a Colorado baker who had refused to...

  • Hazen Paper Co. v. Biggins 507 U.S. 604 (1993) The Supreme Court resolved a split among...

    Hazen Paper Co. v. Biggins 507 U.S. 604 (1993) The Supreme Court resolved a split among the circuits in the following case, where it confronted the question of whether an employer violates the ADEA where factors other than age motivate the adverse employment decision. The Hazens hired Walter Biggins in 1977 and fired him in 1986 when he was 62 years old. Biggins sued, alleging a violation of the ADEA. The Hazens claimed instead that they terminated him because he...

  • Local 28, Sheet Metal Workers v. EEOC 478 U.S. 421 (1986) The union and its apprenticeship...

    Local 28, Sheet Metal Workers v. EEOC 478 U.S. 421 (1986) The union and its apprenticeship committee were found guilty of discrimination against Hispanics and African-Americans and were ordered to remedy the violations. They were found numerous times to be in contempt of the court’s order, and after 18 years the court eventually imposed fines and an affirmative action plan as a remedy. The plan included benefits to persons not members of the union. The Supreme Court held the remedies...

  • Review the following court case: Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co. 419 U.S. 345(1974) 1. What are...

    Review the following court case: Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co. 419 U.S. 345(1974) 1. What are the facts of this case? What is the issue? 2. In what court was it decided, and how did it get to that court? 3. What did the court below decide, and why? What did this court decide, and why? 4. What does it mean to be "affected with the public interest"? 5. What is the significance of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S....

  • Case 10.7 Polly Ann Heller v. Elizabeth Forward School District 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 13547 (U.S. Third Circuit Court of...

    Case 10.7 Polly Ann Heller v. Elizabeth Forward School District 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 13547 (U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals) The issue is whether the school district had a valid explanation for paying younger male teachers higher salaries than it was paying three female teachers who were over 50 years of age. NYGAARD, CIRCUIT JUDGE. The School District’s salary scale and the collective bargaining agreement between the School District and the teachers’ union, sets different “steps” in salary depending...

  • The Commissioner of Internal Revenue ("Commissioner") appeals the Tax Court's decision that he abused his discretion...

    The Commissioner of Internal Revenue ("Commissioner") appeals the Tax Court's decision that he abused his discretion in requiring Jim Turin & Sons, Inc. ("taxpayer"), to use the accrual method of accounting to compute its federal taxes for the tax years at issue. In particular, the Commissioner contests the Tax Court's finding that emulsified asphalt is not "merchandise," as that term is used in 26 C.F.R.S 1.471-1. The Tax Court had jurisdiction pursuant to 26 U.S.C.SS 6213, 6214, and 7442. We...

  • The Commissioner of Internal Revenue ("Commissioner") appeals the Tax Court's decision that he abused his discretion...

    The Commissioner of Internal Revenue ("Commissioner") appeals the Tax Court's decision that he abused his discretion in requiring Jim Turin & Sons, Inc. ("taxpayer"), to use the accrual method of accounting to compute its federal taxes for the tax years at issue. In particular, the Commissioner contests the Tax Court's finding that emulsified asphalt is not "merchandise," as that term is used in 26 C.F.R.S 1.471-1. The Tax Court had jurisdiction pursuant to 26 U.S.C.SS 6213, 6214, and 7442. We...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT