Looking for an essay, minimum 1000 words (NO PLAGIARISM). Should be 5 or more paragraphs with a clear introduction, thesis statement, body and conclusion. The scientific method forms the basis of scientific investigation and discovery. Describe an example to demonstrate the process of scientific inquiry and the key steps involved.
Significant institutional development of science was taking
place and terminologies establishing their boundaries between the
scientific and non scientific two fields which used to give the
terms like ok science and pseudo science during the 19th century .
The term scientific method was started during this century only.
This term has become more popular in use in the 20th century.
Scientific method is part of the scientific investigation.
Scientific investigation is carried out to prove a logical theory
or to find out a solution for a logical question evening scientific
method of experiments. Science is the systematic study of both
physical and living world by observations, readings and carrying
out experiments. Hypothesis is a proposed explanation for some
observed phenomena based on the theoretical knowledge or experience
or research. Thus, the scientific method is is a process which
involves systematic way off measurable observations by carrying out
experiments to formulate or to test or modify a hypothesis. So, by
being part of scientific investigation the scientific methods or
used to develop better models and explanations for the benefit of
the living world and mankind.
There are different fields are subjects in science. Thus, the
procedures of scientific method vary from one field to another.
Although the procedures vary from one field to another, they are
almost similar from one to another, such as making hypothesis,
deriving predictions from the hypothesis, carrying out experiments
and then making empirical observations based on those predictions.
The hypothesis may be specific or very broad also which has to be e
tested with experiments or studies. Hypothesis must be falsifiable
which implies that it is possible to identify a possible outcome of
an experiment for an observation that may conflict with the
predictions deduced from the actual hypothesis, otherwise the
hypothesis cannot be meaningfully tested.
The experiment is intended to prove weather the observations agree
with or contrary to the predictions that are derived from
hypothesis. There are many difficulties in making a formulaic
statement of method. Scientific method is carried out based on a
set of general principles in a fixed sequence of steps. But all the
steps of one scientific method may not be taking place in every
other scientific method. They will vary from one method to other
based on the context and concept of the enquiry that is made to
check a particular hypothesis in its specific area of
research.
There are 5 steps in any scientific method of research. They are
formulation of equation, hypothesis, prediction, testing and
analysis.
Formulation of equation involves the observation of the naturally
occurring phenomena and seeking the reasoning behind those
phenomena in a logically convincing way. This stage is usually
involving the readings of previously conducted experimental
evidences, personal scientific observations and the analysis of the
works of other scientists. If the answer is available readily for
the asked question then any new question can be made based on the
given answer for the first question.
A hypothesis is a conjecture based on the knowledge obtained
while formulating a question. hypothesis main explain any given
behaviour. Hypothesis can be very specific or broad also. The terms
that are commonly associated in the statistical hypotheses are null
hypothesis and alternative hypothesis. A null hypothesis is the
conjecture that the statistical hypothesis is false. The
alternative hypothesis is the desired outcome. Scientific
hypothesis must be falsifiable which refers that one can identify a
possible outcome of an experiment that conflicts with predictions
deduced from the hypothesis otherwise it cannot be meaning fully
tested.
Production involves the determining of the logical consequences of
the hypothesis. One or more predictions are selected for further
testing. Ideally the prediction must also distinguish the
hypothesis from likely alternatives.
Testing is investigation of how the real world behaves as predicted
by the hypothesis. Scientists will carry out the experiments to
test the hypothesis. If the results of the experiments agree the
predictions of the hypothesis then the confidence in the hypothesis
increase otherwise it will decrease. Experiments always depend on
several hypothesis. Experiments can be can be done in any workplace
based on the convenience of scientist.
Analysis of experiments involves determining offer what the results
of the experiment have soon and deciding on what next actions have
to take place. The predictions of the hypothesis or compared to
those of the null hypothesis to determine which one is the better
to be able to explain the given data obtained by the experiment.
The statistical analysis can be made if the experiment has been
carried out in repeated times. If the results of the experiments
have falsified the hypothesis then there is a need of new
hypothesis. If the results of the experiment supports the already
given hypothesis but the evidence is not that strong enough for the
higher level of confidence then and other predictions from the
hypothesis also will be tested. Once a hypothesis is strongly
supported by the evidences that are given out by the experiments
then any question can be asked to provide further insights on the
same topic. the experiences and the evidences from other scientists
are also frequently Incorporated at any stage in the process of
analysis. Depending on on the complexity of the experiment many
iterations may be required which will gather sufficient evidence
that can answer a question with the higher level of confidence or
to build up many answers to highly specific questions in order to
answer a single broader question
Example: deducing the structure of the DNA by Watson and Crick.
Looking for an essay, minimum 1000 words (NO PLAGIARISM). Should be 5 or more paragraphs with...
(ABSOLUTELY NO PLAGIARISM) NEED A PAPER, MINIMUM 750 - 1000 WORDS, With an introduction paragraph, multi body paragraphs and conclusion paragraph. The topic is: Discuss the Japanese viewpoint in deciding to bomb Pearl Harbor in 1941. (NO PLAGIARISM)
RRM # 2 (ends at for organization, and they force their ideas to fit it. Along the way, their perfectly good ideas get mangled or lost). Purple # 2 1. Create a simple outline of the bulleted points. RRM # 3(ends at it doesn't begin to explore how or why something happened.) Purple # 3 2. Does this relate to you? Do you write like this? 3. Predict what will come next. RRM # 4 (ends at opened are, in...
Write 3 paragraphs for reflection and should be do the following: 1. In first paragraph, Summarize the article (attached below). (Don't plagiarism from article. Please use your own words to summarize article below) 2. In second paragraph, Connect the article with one of those "biological variation in modern humans" or "cultural anthropology" or "how identity and worldview are deeply influenced by cultural upbringing" or "human pre-history, human social interaction, and human cultures". Be specific about the connections you make. 3....
My Study on Sickle Cell Anemia Research In 500 words, answer the following questions 1.Select your study sample 2. How have you selected your sample? 3. How will you select your sample population and give the rationale behind your decision Please type the solution on the keyboard so that I can copy and paste Q. No 1. Answer : Sickle cell disease : It is defined as it is a chronic heriditory form of Anemia, in which the red blood...
HEA 285 Wellness Project Guide Sheet The wellness project focuses on the process of changing personal behavior. The primary focus is the PROCESS of behavior ou e comfortable working with and sharing with your instructor. Please see your this project. Objective: The purpose of the wellness projet is to 1. Demo nstrate knowledge of lifestyle behaviors that promote wellness & reduce the risk of illness, injury. and disease 2. Demonstrate responsible decision making skillsfor the enhancement of individual Steps to...
Read the article below and in your own words, (1-2 sentences) what is the "true direction" or right way to interpret nature, according to Bacon? True Directions Concerning the Interpretation of Nature (1620) Francis Bacon Those who have taken it on themselves to lay down the law of nature as something that has already been discovered and understood, whether they have spoken in simple confidence or in a spirit of professional posturing, have done great harm to philosophy and the...
I need help with my very last assignment of this term PLEASE!!, and here are the instructions: After reading Chapter Two, “Keys to Successful IT Governance,” from Roger Kroft and Guy Scalzi’s book entitled, IT Governance in Hospitals and Health Systems, please refer to the following assignment instructions below. This chapter consists of interviews with executives identifying mistakes that are made when governing healthcare information technology (IT). The chapter is broken down into subheadings listing areas of importance to understand...
Using the CNA Insurance company Knowledge Management scenario (below), carry out the following knowledge management assignment Questions after reading the scenario/essay: =============================================================================================================== For Gordon Larson, telling stories is all in a day's work at his job as chief knowledge officer at CNA, and that's just fine with executives at the Chicago-based insurance giant. Larson owes his job to a shift in corporate direction. Three years ago, under the direction of a new chairman, CNA set off on a new mission....
Actions that damage a company and its employees should be stamped out, everyone would agree. But should the people responsible be stamped out, too? HBR CASE STUDY The Reign of Zero Tolerance by Ben Gerson "Mr. Pemberton?" manager. The guards had radioed her that the "Yes, that's me," Simon replied distractedly, his back turned. target wasn't putting up much resistance. "Your personal belongings will be messen The two burly gentlemen who had suddenly gered to your home later today," Sallie...
Using the book, write another paragraph or two: write 170 words: Q: Compare the assumptions of physician-centered and collaborative communication. How is the caregiver’s role different in each model? How is the patient’s role different? Answer: Physical-centered communication involves the specialists taking control of the conversation. They decide on the topics of discussion and when to end the process. The patient responds to the issues raised by the caregiver and acts accordingly. On the other hand, Collaborative communication involves a...