Question

how would you RESPONSE to THIS PARAGRAPH : I think that PGS is very useful for someone who is know to have reoccurring miscarriages, people who are older and ovaries don't work like they are supposed to work, and even people who keep failing fertility treatments. PGS can be more very helpful for these types of people to get a better idea of what is going on that's causing these issues. In terms of against, it's wrong to go against the cycle of life, and try to change something that's naturally occurring. Also the fact that these tests won't give you 100% accurate data. I think if someone is afraid of their future child coming out with an extra chromosome or some chromosomal abnormality, then they should be give the right to PGS. Genetic counselors look at a persons family history, then use it to check if the person's offspring will have this same issues. But in the end it's non-directive because the subject makes the decision if they want to go through the advice or not.

Answer 1

This paragraph to a great extent highlights PGS in a positive light but do not sidelines the negative side calling it not being 100% accurate pointing to some uncertainties associated to it.

Pre-implantation genetic screening is a test that provides information about the genetic makeup of the cells found in the embryo.

In the modern era where mutation and abnormalities are the most talked terms PGS is very helpful in screening the embryos for family with serious disorder history. Also for working females who prefer delayed pregnancy wherein the oocytes are generally abnormal and with people suffering from recurring miscarriages, PGS is a boon. One might call it going against nature but something that cheers up a family and provides a healthy child is no way wrong.