you are asked to determine the protein content of ground beef, using a spectrophotometric method. Discuss your considerations to ensure sufficient protein extraction.
Ans.)
Materials and Methods
2.1. Chemicals and Reagents
All reagents used in the experiment were of analytical grade.
Potassium chloride, disodium phosphate, monopotassium phosphate,
urea, thiourea, dithiothreitol, cholamidopropyl dimethyl hydroxy
propanesulfonate (CHAPS), IGEPAL® CA-630 NP 40, glycerol, and tris
were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Acrylamide,
bis-acrylamide, ammonium persulfate (APS),
N,N,N,N-Tetramethylethylenediamine (TEMED), sodium dodecyl sulfate
(SDS), tris(hydroxymethyl)-aminomethane, glycine, bromophenol blue,
β-mercaptoethanol, and Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 were
purchased from Bio-Rad Laboratories (Hercules, CA).
Phosphate buffer (pH 7, 0.003 M), KCl phosphate buffer (pH 7.5), and Tris-HCl (pH 8, 20 mM) were freshly prepared. Ultrapure water was obtained in the laboratory using a Water Purification System Barnstead™ Pacific TII (ThermoFisher Scientific, USA).
2.2. Samples Collection and Preparation
Meat samples from longissimus thoracis muscle of beef and lamb;
pectoralis major muscle of chicken; and dorsal white muscle of fish
from sole (Solea solea), European hake (Merluccius merluccius), and
sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) were purchased from a local market
and immediately transferred under refrigeration to the laboratory.
For each species, a total of fifteen animals were included in the
experiment. Adipose and connective tissues were removed from meat
samples, while bones, scales, and fat were discarded from fish
samples. All fresh samples were finely minced prior to protein
extractions.
2.3. Protein Extraction Methods
The flowchart of the extraction of muscle protein fractions from
different species analyzed is shown in Figure 1. Meat and fish
proteins were fractionated based on different solubility. Samples
were homogenized with 0.03 M phosphate buffer (pH 7) containing a
protease inhibitors cocktail (P2714, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO)
on ice for 2 min using an Ultra-Turrax T18 basic (IKA, Wilmington,
Germany). The homogenate was centrifuged at 8,000 × (Eppendorf
5810R, Eppendorf AG, Hamburg, Germany) for 20 min at 4°C. After
centrifugation, the supernatant (sarcoplasmic proteins) was
discarded, and the extraction of myofibrillar proteins were
obtained as follows.
Two different extraction methods were carried out for myofibrillar
proteins using denaturing and nondenaturing solutions. The
extraction of myofibrillar proteins with non-denaturing solution is
based on the method reported by Hashimoto et al. [10] with the
modifications reported as follows: the pellet recovered was
resuspended in 10 volumes of KCl phosphate buffer pH 7.5 (0.45 M
KCl, 15.6 mM Na2HPO4, 3.5 mM KH2PO4) and vortexed for 2 min. The
vortexing step was introduced to optimize the homogenization of the
pellet and to prevent the formation of a mellow complex. The
mixture was centrifuged twice at 5,000 × (Eppendorf 5810R,
Eppendorf AG, Germany) for 15 min at 4°C. After centrifugation, the
supernatant containing the myofibrillar proteins was recovered,
aliquoted, and frozen at −80°C.
For comparison, myofibrillar proteins were extracted using denaturing solution according to Marino et al. [11]. Briefly, the pellet was resuspended in a solution (8.3 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 64 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), CHAPS 2% (3-((3-cholamidopropyl) dimethylammonio)-1-propanesulfonate), IGEPAL 2%, glycerol 10%, and 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8) and incubated overnight at 4°C in an orbital shaker. Subsequently, samples were centrifuged at 15,000 × (Eppendorf 5810R, Eppendorf AG, Germany) for 20 min at 10°C. After centrifugation, the supernatant containing myofibrillar proteins was recovered, aliquoted, and frozen at −80°C until further protein analysis to avoid calpain protease activation.
For each species, all myofibrillar extracts obtained with the different methods were quantified using the Bradford protein assay (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). Absorbance was measured at 580 nm by the spectrophotometric assay (Power Wave XS, Biotek, UK), with a bovine serum albumin (BSA; >98% pure, Sigma-Aldrich) standard curve.
2.4. SDS-PAGE Analysis
The fifteen myofibrillar extracts of each species obtained by the
denaturing or nondenaturing method were pooled and resolved by
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis in a gradient gel 8–18%
[11]. Gels were loaded with 50 μg of proteins and run with a
Protean II xi vertical slab gel unit (Bio-Rad Laboratories,
Hercules, CA). Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 was used to visualize
bands of interest. Gels were destained in an aqueous solution of
acetic acid and methanol (10% v/v, and 7% v/v, respectively) and
acquired by the ChemiDoc EQ system (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules,
CA). The relative quantity of each band was determined as
percentage of the signal intensity of the defined band in a lane
with the Quantity One software (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules,
CA). Identification of the protein molecular weight was done by
comparison with the precision plus protein standard-broad range
(Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA).
2.5. Statistical Analysis
Protein concentration and electrophoretic data were analyzed using
the GLM procedure of the SAS statistical software [12]. The tested
effect was the extraction methods on the myofibrillar fraction of
muscle proteins from beef, lamb, chicken, sole, hake, and sea bass.
When significant differences were found (at ), the Student t-test
was used to locate significant differences among means.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Protein Extractability
Solubility is an indicator of protein extractability; indeed, a
solubilized protein could be easily extracted into a solution from
muscle fibers or myofibrils [9]. The amount of myofibrillar
proteins extracted using denaturing and nondenaturing solutions
from beef, lamb, chicken, sole, European hake, and sea bass is
reported in Figure 2. No differences were found in the protein
extractability of beef, European hake, and sea bass when the
different extraction methods were tested, evidencing that
nondenaturing extraction method led to successful protein
extraction as denaturing extraction method. The physical force
applied by repeated centrifugations damaged the structures of
myofibrillar proteins partly allowing the dissolution of
myofibrillar proteins in water.
you are asked to determine the protein content of ground beef, using a spectrophotometric method. Discuss...
Discuss: 1. Determine the protein content of a fast food menu item that contains some type of animal protein (beef, chicken, pork, fish....... 2. Discuss the possible implications of consuming protein at levels near or above the upper end of the AMDR range. Include a discussion of how the dietary sources of protein might affect potential risk. For credit you need to include scientifically based information. Statements such as "my friend is a body builder and told me that they...
You use Kjeldahl method to determine protein content of a food: – You took 0.5 g food – You used 12.6 mL HCl of 0.1010 N to titrate the NH3 that is trapped in boric acid – Determine in sequence: 1) mmole of NH3; 2) gram of N; 3) gram of protein (use 6.25 factor); 4) protein content of this food, in %
Suppose you were asked to determine nickel in a steel sample using a gravemetric method of analysis. State the precipitation reagent that you would use and conditions that would be suitable for the precipitation. What experimental variables would you control to ensure that a crystalline precipitate is formed ?
You determine that the protein content of flour sample is 10.25% with a standard deviation of 0.13%. If you will only accept flour sample that have protein content within 2 standard deviations of the mean, what range of protein content will you accept?
The Kjeldahl method was used to determine the nitrogen content of a protein. A 275 uL aliquot of a 45.1 mg/mL protein solution was digested in boiling sulfuric acid. The solution was made basic and the liberated NH, was collected in 5.00 mL of 0.0512 M HCl. A volume of 7.01 mL of 0.0174 M NaOH was required to react with the excess HCl. Calculate the weight percent of nitrogen in the protein. weight percent: wt%N
I was instructed to use the standard curve to determine the protein content of each of the 5 “unknown” samples and record each value in a table. record the protein content value you determined from your standard curve how is this calculated on a graph?
Describe a study for which content analysis is the appropriate research method. Discuss how you would use manifest and latent coding. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the two coding schemes.
As a consultant with the Ace Security Consulting Co., you have been asked to determine how encrypted documents containing sensitive information can be made available to several hundred office workers in the Very Good Software Company. The encrypted files can be downloaded from an internal web site at Very Good Software. What considerations and methods can be used to ensure easy downloading and reading of the encrypted documents while minimizing the risk of compromise? Put your response and findings into...
The exact ground state energy of He is -79.0 eV. Using the variational method, you calculate an approximate energy to be -83.0 eV. You must have made an error because the variational method energies must A. Equal the exact ground state energy B. Be positive C. (Equal or) lie above the ground state D. (Equal or) lie below the ground state
A technician you supervise is to determine the moisture content of a food product by the Karl Fischer method. Your technician wants to know what is this "Karl Fischer Reagent Water Equivalence" that is used in the equation to calculate percentage of moisture in the sample, why is it necessary, and how it is determined. Give the technician your answer.